Posted by: Nic Butler | 25 January 2011

Faces of Charleston, 1901-2

Theodora Huguenin, 1902

Theodora Huguenin, 1902

The Charleston Archive is proud to announce the digitization of more than 1300 portrait photographs representing a sample of the (mostly Caucasian) men and women of Charleston in 1901–2. These photos constitute a unique collection in our archive that we call “The South Carolina & West Indian Exposition Photo Passbook, 1901–1902.” The small, oval-shaped photos in this collection were taken as part of a season pass that patrons could purchase for unlimited admission to the South Carolina Inter-State and West Indian Exposition, held in Charleston in late 1901 through the spring of 1902. Each individual’s photo was mounted in a passbook kept by the patron and a duplicate photo was mounted in an album kept by the Director of the Departments of Admissions and Collections, Hugh James Fleming (whose image appear on page 34 of the passbook, I.D. number 297). The album contains images of 1,326 people, of whom 1,213 are identified by a caption presumably made at the time the photograph was taken. The total number of season pass photos taken for the Exposition is unknown, but similar photos beyond the present collection are known to survive in extant individual Exposition pass books.

William Lagare, 1902

William Lagare, 1902

Hugh James Fleming donated this photographic album in 1948 to the Charleston Free Library (our home, now called the Charleston County Public Library). The letter regarding its provenance and donation to the library has been included as the final image in this collection (image number 157). Since the paper on which the gelatin silver photographs are mounted is extremely brittle and in a state of deterioration, the album was disbound several years prior to its digitization in order to facilitate its preservation.

Archival assistant Celeste Wiley carefully digitized each page of the photo passbook and transcribed each of the names contained therein. The entire 1902-2 passbook can now be viewed, browsed, and searched, through the website of the Lowcountry Digital Library.

Posted by: Nic Butler | 21 November 2010

Charleston’s House of Correction

Most aficionados of Charleston history are familiar with the formidable-looking old County Jail at the southeast corner of Franklin and Magazine streets (often erroneously called the “City Jail”) and the sordid tales of its sometimes-gruesome past. But how many history fans have ever heard of Charleston’s “House of Correction,” which was once located on the same block as the County Jail? I would wager that few have, so we at the Charleston Archive are trying to shed some light on this long-forgotten institution and the interesting tales of its brief existence.

Between 1856 and 1885, the City of Charleston operated a “House of Correction” for the short-term incarceration of petty offenders. It’s inmates included males and females ranging from ages 5 to 75, and embraced both white and “colored” citizens. They served short sentences, usually five to ten days, but occasionally as long as thirty or even forty days. From May 1856 to February 1865, the House of Correction was located in the old Poor House building on the west side of Mazyck (now Logan) Street, between Queen and Magazine Streets. The institution was closed for the first three years of the city’s post-war occupation by Federal forces, but reopened in March 1868. From that time until mid-1872, the House of Correction was located in the west wing of the city’s old Workhouse, which was originally designed to house unruly or misbehaving slaves. In 1872 the House of Correction moved northward to the campus of a new city institution called the Ashley River Asylum, located on a fifteen-acre site at the west end of Mount (now Sumter) Street. Here the inmates worked on the “City Farm,” raising vegetables for the inmates of other city institutions, and tended the grounds of the city’s Public Cemetery (potter’s field).

The surviving records of Charleston’s House of Correction consist of one leather-bound volume containing 4,004 entries of persons admitted between March 1868 and June 1885. For each inmate, the record includes his/her date of admittance, name, age, place of nativity, last residence, duration in Charleston, occupation, and date of discharge. As one might imagine, this material could be a valuable resource for genealogists and historians of all stripes. In order to facilitate the use of these records, therefore, we at the Charleston Archive were determined to prepare a transcription for public use and dissemination.

In the spring of 2010, College of Charleston senior Gillian Coté volunteered to perform the bulk of the labor. In the span of about eighteen weeks, working four to six hours a week, Gillian transcribed the 4,004 entries into an Excel spreadsheet. Over the next several months, I proofread this material, carefully checking every letter and number against the original manuscript records. After transferring Gillian’s work into a Word document and formatting it for publication, I wrote an introduction that surveys the history of the House of Correction, describes the surviving records, and explains our transcription methodology.

I am pleased to announce that our transcription, Records of the Charleston House of Correction, 1868–1885, has now been (self) published. Bound copies will soon be available in the South Carolina History Room at the Charleston County Public Library (as soon as they return from the bindery). In addition, I have made a searchable PDF version of our transcription, which is available for download. So if you’d like to peruse this newly-available historic material, or if you’d like to print a copy for your own library, here are the links to the PDF document, which is broken into three parts:

Records of the Charleston House of Correction, 1868–1885: Front Matter

Records of the Charleston House of Correction, 1868–1885, sorted by DATE

Records of the Charleston House of Correction, 1868–1885, sorted by SURNAME

If you have any questions or comments about these materials, don’t hesitate to contact us here at the Charleston Archive.

Posted by: Nic Butler | 14 October 2010

Preservation Photos Digitized

The Charleston Archive and its partner, the Lowcountry Digital Library, are pleased to announce the digital debut of 985 photographs from our collection of the Records of the Historic Preservation Planner, Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments (BCDCOG), 1970–1981. The bulk of this large collection is composed of research documentation, including photos, pertaining to several hundred historic properties in the tri-county. This material was collected in the 1970s and early 1980s for the purpose of placing the properties on the then recently created National Register of Historic Places. Most of the sites included in this collection were successfully added to the National Register, but some did not pass muster for one reason or another. A full description of the contents of this collection can be found in its finding aid, which is available from our Collections page on this website.

The majority of the photographs in this collection were taken by Elias Ball Bull—the first to hold the title of  “Historic Preservation Planner” for the Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester Council of Governments.  In many cases, the photos in this collection are the originals of those filed with the National Register nomination forms. As such, some already appear on the National Register website, and some can be found on the website of the South Carolina Department of Archives and History.

Archives staff member Celeste Wiley spent months patiently digitizing these photographs. In the course of this work, she not only made high-resolution digital scans of the images, but also created rich metadata files for each image that provide robust contextual data to viewers. Thanks, Celeste!

We invite you to peruse these 985 images by visiting the Lowcountry Digital Library site and clicking on CCPL under the “Institutions” link. Alternatively, you can follow this direct link to the front page of the Preservation Planner’s photographs: http://lowcountrydigital.library.cofc.edu/cdm4/browse.php?CISOROOT=/BCD.

Posted by: Nic Butler | 21 September 2010

Concert Night in Colonial Charleston

This Thursday evening at 7 p.m., Charleston Archive manager, Dr. Nic Butler, will be presenting an illustrated lecture at the Charleston Library Society. The title of the program is “Concert Night in Colonial Charleston; Or, How to Snare a Mate with Music.” The topic stems from the research used to compile Butler’s book, Votaries of Apollo: The St. Cecilia Society and the Patronage of Concert Music in Charleston, South Carolina, 1766-1822 (USC Press, 2007), but the lecture isn’t strictly academic in tone. The presentation will include audio examples and visuals to help the audience imagine the sights and sounds that men and women would have experienced while attending a formal concert in early Charleston. lt’ll be educational, to be sure, but also light, fun, and just a little scandalous.

For more information about the event, contact the Charleston Library Society (164 King Street) at 843-723-9912. Hope to see you there!

Posted by: Nic Butler | 10 September 2010

Translating Old Street Addresses In Charleston

Last month I posted an essay about the history of street numbers or building addresses on the Charleston peninsula. After reading that historical survey, one might wonder how to go about translating an “old” number into a modern address. It’s not necessarily an easy process, but here’s my best advice on solving that mystery.

The fact that the streets of peninsular Charleston have been renumbered several times over the past three centuries can cause confusion for anyone attempting to match a “historic” street number (one taken from a historic source) to a modern address. Depending on the vintage of the number in question, this process might be quite simple, but in other cases the historic number might be wildly different from the modern number. Anyone attempting to locate the modern location of a historic address should therefore proceed with caution, for there is no simple rule for making this translation. The solution will depend on a number of variables, including the date of the historic reference in question and the size of the lot in question.

Whether you are attempting to locate the residence of a distant ancestor or tracing the history of a specific building, you must bear in mind one important rule: the key to tracing the history of a particular piece of property in Charleston is understanding its succession of ownership, or “chain of title.” Since most of the available records you will consult are organized by surname, you will need to acquire the names of the individuals through whose ownership the property passed.

Remember that your ancestor, or the occupants of the old building you are studying, may have rented the property in question. People from all walks of life, from planters to paupers, executed short- and long-term property leases in historic Charleston, but very few records of these transactions survive. In such cases, you still need to establish the property’s chain of title and then use sources such as city directories to connect temporary occupants to it.

The following suggestions are intended to direct researchers to the most pertinent resources:

  1. Track your target names(s) through the various Charleston city directories, which are available from 1782 to the present (though not necessarily published every year). Your subject’s street number may change over the years, especially in the directories of the late 1700s and early 1800s, but keep in mind that such changes do not necessarily mean he/she relocated. Whenever possible, try to identify the name(s) of the occupant(s) who resided at your target address, as well as the names of his or her neighbors, over a period of years. The more names you can tie to a specific location, the easier it will be to confirm the fixed location of an address even if the street number changed several times.
  2. The Charleston city directory of 1840 includes a “reverse directory”: an alphabetical listing of streets that identifies each street address and its occupant. Similar  “reverse directories” are also found in the city directory from 1890 onward. These later directories post-date the renumbering project of 1884–1886, however, so the information they contain might only serve to confirm what you already know.
  3. Find your subject in the earliest extant property tax record: the City of Charleston Tax Assessor’s Ward Books, 1852–1856. These records are divided into separate volumes for each ward, and the street names are indexed at the beginning of each volume. Under each street heading is a list of names representing the property owners and an incomplete listing of street numbers. These names are listed in geographic order; that is, they appear in the same as if you were walking in the street. Thus if your subject’s name is located near a recognizable landmark such as a church or the intersection of two streets, you may be able to match that location to a modern street number without further work (unless the lots have since been subdivided or merged). Similarly, Charleston County tax assessment records from the 1870s onward are also available on microfilm in the South Carolina Room at the Charleston County Public Library (CCPL).
  4. Consult Ford’s 1861 Census of the City of Charleston, in which the contents are arranged alphabetically by street name and then sequentially by house number. If you know the street number and/or the name of the occupant, you can count the number of doors between your target address and the nearest landmark such as a church or intersection. Always keep in mind, however, that these lots might have been subdivided or merged before or after the date of this 1861 survey. Also bear in mind that the city never officially adopted Ford’s numbering system (see the historical narrative above).
  5. The Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps of Charleston of 1884 and 1888 both include street numbers, and thus offer a snapshot of the addresses as they existed before and after the renumbering of 1884–1886. Note, however, that these maps do not encompass every building standing in the city at that time.
  6. Consult the Report of Committee on Condition of Buildings after the Earthquake, with a List of Buildings that Should Come Down, published shortly after the earthquake that struck Charleston on 31 August 1886. This report, which is available on microfilm in the South Carolina Room at CCPL, includes the street number and owner’s name of every building in the city.
  7. Milby Burton’s unpublished two-volume typescript “Streets of Charleston,” a copy of which can be found in the South Carolina Room at CCPL, contains a brief historical survey of all peninsular streets and includes dated references to street modifications such as widening, lengthening, renaming, etc.
  8. The most definitive strategy, and also the most laborious, is to perform a “chain of title” search. In order to do this, you must visit the Charleston County Register of Mesne Conveyance Office (RMC), which contains records of nearly all property conveyances within Charleston County from 1719 to the present (a small percentage were never recorded). Here you find indices that will direct you to specific volumes containing real estate transactions relating to your target property. The eighteenth- and nineteenth-century deeds are indexed by surname, while the twentieth- and twenty-first-century deeds are indexed by geographic location. Once you find the deeds relating to your subject, read the description of the property for clues to its precise location. If the early descriptions of your target property are too vague to determine its precise location, you might have to perform similar title searches on the neighboring properties in order to establish a larger contextual framework. Note that published abstracts of all deeds from 1719 through 1788 are available in the South Carolina Room at CCPL.
  9. In the course of your “chain of title” research, you might encounter difficulty determining how a certain piece of property came into the possession of a specific individual. In such cases, remember that the property could have been conveyed by means of marriage or inheritance rather than by deed. Transcriptions of all extant South Carolina wills, 1671–1868, as well as copious records of early Charleston marriages, are available in the South Carolina History Room at CCPL.

Like this essay? You can download a PDF version of it (with footnotes) from our PATHFINDER page.

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.